《大卫科波菲尔》中的人物分析

中文的 谢谢

大卫科波菲尔:从小就没有父亲,母亲也在继父的折磨下,含冤而终,很快他自己也被送去当学徒,可以说童年是多么痛苦。后来他来到了姨婆家,在这里受到了良好的教育。后来来到了伦敦,在律师事务所工作,遭遇到一系列的打击,包括爱人的死亡,也揭穿希普的阴谋,后来成为作家,也与爱妮斯终成眷属。他是一个善良的人,对待恩人知恩图报,在当时罪恶的生活中他没有迷失自己,不仅把握自己,也帮助别人,聪明,感情纤细,对世界怀有爱心,意志坚强,道德高尚。

贝西姨婆:她是一个性情古怪的人,在大卫刚出生时,由于不是女孩,她决定不抚养大卫,但真在大卫有困难时,他积极伸出援手,给大卫最好的教育。后来在希普的阴谋中破产。以为是爱妮斯的父亲所致,为了不伤害爱妮斯,她就不再追究。对于大卫的妻子朵拉给予最大的宽容,对爱妮斯怀着深深的关怀。总之,他是一个善良的老妇人,对人赤诚,虽古怪孤单,但心地上极其无私善良,谁个可爱的老妇人,给大卫母亲般的关怀。

爱妮斯:在大卫在读书时,是大卫最好的朋友,善良,关心他人,了解别人的心里,为他人着想,对待父亲孝顺有加,当希普迫害其父时,为了父亲,忍辱负重,在大卫迷茫时,总能用最平和的态度,为大卫指明航向,关心朵拉,最终有情人终成眷属。她真是一个美丽善良的女孩。

辟提果大叔以及辟提果:这两兄妹,真是善良的人。辟提果她作为大卫母亲的保姆,亲眼看到他们所遭受的痛苦,对大卫就像自己的亲生的儿子。后来嫁给了善良的马车夫,两人在后来人经常帮助大卫,最后马车夫死时,还将仅有的财产分给大卫,可见夫妻俩的善良无私。辟提果大叔是一个善良的老船工,一生无儿无女,却收留两个孩子,和一个老妇人。对待别人亲和有善,尤其是自己的养女艾米丽,在他私奔后,他不顾日夜,到处寻找他,可见作为父亲爱女心切,不希望女儿受到伤害,后来,历经千辛万苦,找到无依无靠的女儿,带她去了澳大利亚。而另一个孤儿海姆,他爱着艾米丽,艾米丽的私奔让他心碎,不过他依然爱着。后来在海上有个年轻人遇难,那人正是诱拐艾米丽私奔的斯提福兹,不过他还是拼了性命,救了他。带着对艾米丽的爱,离开人世。多么善良,爱的多么深沉。

希普:他简直就是为了衬托那些善良的人的恶棍。她在艾米丽的父亲的家中,做学徒,可他向来就是一个装模作样,谄媚的小人,连他的母亲也是这样,装出恭敬的样子,其实另有阴谋。他爱慕爱妮斯的美貌,对她家的财产也另有心计。他灌醉爱妮斯的父亲,让他签错文件,让他内疚,又用爱妮斯来威胁他,使得律师行掌握在他手上。最后,在大卫,密考博先生的帮助下,抓住他的把柄,将他送入监牢。

摩德斯通兄妹:摩德斯通就是大卫的继父,他骗取大卫的母亲的信任,是为他家的财产,对待大卫的母亲冷酷之极,把大卫送入很差的学校,不让母子俩见面,毒打大卫,让大伟母亲伤透了心,最终导致这个可怜的孩子(大卫的母亲,年纪很小,心地善良,姨婆称她为孩子)的死亡。摩德斯通的姐姐,也是冷酷的女人,掌握家中的财政大权,对待那孩子,也让她濒临心碎。他们俩辞退了辟提果,让大卫去当学徒,掌握了全家。后来大卫长大,在朵拉家见到了这两个人,还好朵拉并不相信这两个恶棍。
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2009-02-05
The story is told almost entirely from the point of view of the first person narrator, David Copperfield himself, and was the first Dickens novel to do so.

Critically, it is considered a Bildungsroman and would be influential in the genre which included Dickens's own Great Expectations (1861), Thomas Hardy's Jude the Obscure, Samuel Butler's The Way of All Flesh, H. G. Wells's Tono-Bungay, D. H. Lawrence's Sons and Lovers, and James Joyce's Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.

As a bildungsroman, it has one major theme throughout, the disciplining of the hero's emotional and moral life. We learn to go against "the first mistaken impulse of the undisciplined heart", a theme which is repeated throughout all the relationships and characters in the novel.

Characters in the novel generally belong to one of three categories: Those who have disciplined hearts, those who lack disciplined hearts, or those who develop disciplined hearts over time. Characters who fall into the first category include the mature and caring Agnes Wickfield and the selfless and forgiving Mr. Peggotty. The greedy, scheming Uriah Heep and the egotistic and inconsiderate James Steerforth are examples of characters who belong in the second category. Members of the third category include David Copperfield himself, who learns to make wiser choices in his relationships through personal experience, and his aunt Betsy Trotwood, who lacks consideration for others early on, but becomes less inconsiderate over time. Dickens uses characters and events throughout the novel as comparisons and contrasts for each other in terms of wisdom and discipline. A good comparison is Agnes Wickfield and Dora Spenlow: Dora lacks maturity and is unable to handle stressful situations, often breaking out in tears, while Agnes remains calm and collected even when troubled, yielding to her emotions only rarely. Another good comparison is Ham and Mr. Peggotty, and Mrs. Steerforth and Miss Dartle: The latter two become distraught at the loss of Steerforth, allowing it to trouble them their whole lives, while the former two bear the loss of Emily with dignity and reservation. Despite the premise of this work, Dickens does not give David Copperfield a stiff or unnatural feel, making this novel a supreme display of his genius at work.[citation needed]

Analysis of Major Characters

David Copperfield
Although David narrates his story as an adult, he relays the impressions he had from a youthful point of view. We see how David’s perception of the world deepens as he comes of age. We see David’s initial innocence in the contrast between his interpretation of events and our own understanding of them. Although David is ignorant of Steerforth’s treachery, we are aware from the moment we meet Steerforth that he doesn’t deserve the adulation David feels toward him. David doesn’t understand why he hates Uriah or why he trusts a boy with a donkey cart who steals his money and leaves him in the road, but we can sense Uriah’s devious nature and the boy’s treacherous intentions. In David’s first-person narration, Dickens conveys the wisdom of the older man implicitly, through the eyes of a child.
David’s complex character allows for contradiction and development over the course of the novel. Though David is trusting and kind, he also has moments of cruelty, like the scene in which he intentionally distresses Mr. Dick by explaining Miss Betsey’s dire situation to him. David also displays great tenderness, as in the moment when he realizes his love for Agnes for the first time. David, especially as a young man in love, can be foolish and romantic. As he grows up, however, he develops a more mature point of view and searches for a lover who will challenge him and help him grow. David fully matures as an adult when he expresses the sentiment that he values Agnes’s calm tranquility over all else in his life.

Uriah Heep
Uriah serves a foil to David and contrasts David’s qualities of innocence and compassion with his own corruption. Though Uriah is raised in a cruel environment similar to David’s, Uriah’s upbringing causes him to become bitter and vengeful rather than honest and hopeful. Dickens’s physical description of Uriah marks Uriah as a demonic character. He refers to Uriah’s movements as snakelike and gives Uriah red hair and red eyes. Uriah and David not only have opposing characteristics but also operate at cross-purposes. For example, whereas Uriah wishes to marry Agnes only in order to hurt David, David’s marriages are both motivated by love. The frequent contrast between Uriah’s and David’s sentiments emphasizes David’s kindness and moral integrity.
While David’s character development is a process of increased self-understanding, Uriah grows in his desire to exercise control over himself and other characters. As Uriah gains more power over Mr. Wickfield, his sense of entitlement grows and he becomes more and more power-hungry. The final scenes of the novel, in which Uriah praises his jail cell because it helps him know what he should do, show Uriah’s need to exert control even when he is a helpless prisoner. But imprisonment does not redeem his evil—if anything, it compounds his flaws. To the end, Uriah plots strategies to increase his control. Because he deploys his strategies to selfish purposes that bring harm to others, he stands out as the novel’s greatest villain.

James Steerforth
Steerforth is a slick, egotistical, wealthy young man whose sense of self-importance overwhelms all his opinions. Steerforth underscores the difference between what we understand as readers and what David sees—and fails to see—in his youthful naïveté. David takes Steerforth’s kindness for granted without analyzing his motives or detecting his duplicity. When Steerforth befriends David at Salem House, David doesn’t suspect that Steerforth is simply trying to use David to make friends and gain status. Though Steerforth belittles David from the moment they meet, David is incapable of conceiving that his new friend might be taking advantage of him. Because Steerforth’s duplicity is so clear to us, David’s lack of insight into Steerforth’s true intentions emphasizes his youthful innocence. Steerforth likes David only because David worships him, and his final betrayal comes as a surprise to David but not to us.
相似回答