第2个回答 2018-08-21
·······我是重点提示的分割线······· 1.关于备考前期是否使用单词书记单词的建议。保险起见，我们以六级为标准，过了的童鞋可以不用单词书，只从阅读训练中寻找生词查漏补缺的进行记忆，没过的童靴在3月和4月可以选择将足够的精力用于使用单词书背单词。 2.真题要掐时间做呀！不要一股脑儿十年的都做完呀！ 拉开时间，最近三年的题留在最后做！慢慢看自己的复习成果，很有成就感，有木有！真题很珍贵呀！ 3.考研英语考的是深度，广度在其次，这跟六级区别很大（譬如六级是考单词的主要常见意思，而考研英语考点常常是熟悉单词的次常见释义） for example~ 如果lz没记错的话，06年翻译真题考了个reason~reason~reason！ 4.另外可以选取真题中错的特别多的个别文章，认真笔译成中文！ 心译口译不可取，翻译这东西想到的跟写出来的往往大相径庭，你觉得你理解他的意思了要你翻译成通顺的中文其实还要做很多工作，写出来的过程很重要！ 这一点没有做过的人不会体会！！！ ·······重点提示什么的最重要了······ ~~~~~~~我是第一次添加时的分割线~~~~~~~ 1.大四上学期之前，童鞋们安心英语数学吧，不考数学的童鞋请无视。 2.英语真题绝壁是王道！求求你，信我吧！ 3.英语纯为了应试的话，搞阅读理解吧，搞吐了也要继续搞! (阅读理解里有你需要训练的一切，语法，单词，长难句分析，甚至作文) 4.你真的想在这一年的努力后考出个漂亮的英语成绩吗？ 请注意，我是说一年的努力后，那么背真题阅读理解原文吧！（好吧，我承认这是个笨办法，但是我保证有效，背三篇就会有成效，求求你，信我吧。） 5.单词认识就好，拼写是次要的！关键在于你认出它的速度，这是阅读速度的关键！ 6.背单词尤其是记它的意思，重点在于提高这个词的复现率！（所谓复现率，单词重复出现的频率是也~） ~~~~~~~~~~~~好吧，lz出杀手锏了~~~~~~~~~~~~ 给大家一个复习的具体方法吧！做阅读，有不会的词？继续读吧！读完了？做后面的题吧！ 做完了？对答案吧！错很多？你有两条路。 1.无视它！（如果是阅读理解练习题） 2.研究它！（如果是真题） 再读一遍吧！记得标出不认识的词哦~读第一遍不可以标哦~ 第二遍读完了？回去猜词儿玩儿吧~猜什么词儿？当时是刚标的啦~ 猜不出？查纸质词典去（牛津，韦氏神马的都行~文曲星神马的去死吧！） 查好了？整理出来哦，到专门的本子上！然后，嘿嘿~ ···重点来啦··· 把不会的词儿写在左手上，什么？你是左撇子！写右手吧！ 手的虎口位置比较好！ 不雅观吗？想想一年之后的研究生通知书吧！ ~~~~~~~~~2017-5-18更新一点儿单词记忆心得~~~~~~~~ 愚以为，词根记忆法，联想记忆法等等都是一个意思，就是要从动词可以得到名词可以得到形容词，可以得到副词，能够做到这样的真谛在于记住词根并且熟悉词缀（前缀，后缀，如豆瓣里常出现的ex，就是“前一个”意思的前缀，再如co前缀通常就是表示“共同”意思的前缀，再如in和dis前缀表示“非”，后缀如简单的er和or表示“者”，再如tion将词根变成相关名词，ly将词根变成相关副词或形容词，tism将词根变成相关名词“某主义者”不过词缀的意义也不完全相同，有些特殊的还是要特别对待~）再给一组典型的词根联想记忆的例子，conserve，conservation，conservatism，conservative，conservatory~ 记忆这组关键在于记忆单词或者说词根（conserve），然后通过后缀进行变化~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~更新完毕~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ···重点结束··· 解释：写手上，就是为了提高我刚刚说的单词的复现率！就是逼你去看，什么？写纸条儿上？你绝对不看第二眼，除非你要洗衣服了！单词搞好了？ 恭喜恭喜！最艰难的时刻已经过去鸟！ 接下来，又是两条路。 1.如果是阅读理解练习，这篇阅读理解可以pass了！ 2.如果是真题，研究题目去吧，细细思考！研究的劲头儿~ 给大家一个分析题目的方法吧，把这个选项为什么错写在每个选项的后面，真的要写出来，你想到和写出来是两种境界~ 只要你真的读懂了，大部分的错误你都可以察觉，没有吗？好吧，请精确的翻译每个选项！（请千万注意文中的修饰词，例如，表程度的副词，表状态的副词）好吧，我承认就算是你什么都做到位了还是会有很模棱两可的选项！ 就剩两个了，就是排除不掉了，有木有！ 恭喜你，你碰到了传说中的争议题。。。无视它吧！请保证这种题一套真题不超过两个！ 话说，争议题年年有啊，看看每年考后新东方，点点等机构的答案就知道啦，打得不可开交啊。。。讲课的老师们都搞不定，我们还是留着我们的脑细胞搞搞数学吧！题目也研究好了？每天早上起来反复读吧！只读真题哦！ 只读真题！真题！早读很重要哦~ 解释一下为什么要一直读，读到吐也不停歇~ read，read。read，unti you can recite it~这是背文章的不二法门~ 套用数学中极限的概念~我们这样做是在力图无限逼近背过所有真题文章的这个目标~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~呼···~~~好累···~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
第3个回答 2014-01-12
我这里有14年英语一两篇阅读真题，你看看吧，或许对你有帮助
Text 1
In order to “change lives for the better” and reduce “dependency”, George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the "upfront work search" scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the job centre with a CV, register for the online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?
More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on.” he claimed, “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.
Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the job centre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.
But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever –tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker’s allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance”, conditional on actively seeking a job: no entitlement and no insurance, at £71.70 a week ,one of the least generous in the EU.
21. George Osborne’s scheme was intended to
[A] provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits.
[B] encourage jobseeker’ s active engagement in job seeking.
[C] motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily.
[D] guarantee jobseekers’ legitimate right to benefit.
22. The phase “to sign on”(Line 3,Para.2)most probably means
[A] to check on the availability of jobs at the job centre.
[B] to accept the government’s restrictions on the government.
[C] to register for an allowance from the government.
[D] to attend a governmental job-training program.
23. What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme?
[A] A desire to secure a better life for all.
[B] An eagerness to protect the unemployed.
[C] An urge to be generous to the claimants.
[D] A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers.
24. According to Paragraph 3, being unemployed makes one feel
[A] uneasy.
[B] enraged.
[C] insulted.
[D] guilty.
25. To which of the following would the author most probably agree?
[A] The British welfare system indulges jobseekers’ laziness.
[B] Osborne’s reform will reduce the risk of unemployment.
[C] The jobseekers’ allowance has met their actual needs.
[D] Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.
Text 2
All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.
During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graduates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.
There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal education. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states; a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with $100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.
Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.
The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.
In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow.
26. A lot of students take up law as their profession due to
[A] the growing demand from clients
[B] the increasing pressure of inflation
[C] the prospect of working in big firms
[D] the attraction of financial rewards
27. Which of the following adds to the costs of legal education in most American states?
[A] Higher tuition fees for undergraduate studies
[B] Receiving training by professional associations
[C] Admissions approval from the bar association
[D] Pursuing a bachelors degree in another major
28. Hindrance to the reform of the legal system originates from
[A] the rigid bodies governing the profession
[B] lawyers’ and clients’ strong resistance
[C] the stern exam for would-be lawyers.
[D] non-professionals’ sharp criticism
29. The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive” partly because
[A] prevents lawyers from gaining due profits.
[B] bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession.
[C] aggravates the ethical situation in the trade.
[D] keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares.
30. In the text, the author mainly discusses
[A] the factors that help make a successful lawyer in America.
[B] a problem in America’s legal profession and solutions to it.
[C] the role undergraduate studies in America’s legal education.
[D] flawed ownership of America’s law firms and its causes.