帮忙翻译成中文,急急急啊今天要用

Please allow me to introduce our firm is the trademark agency in China for Schunk Gumbh.
As you know,the client's house mark SHUNK logo was pre-empted by Nantong Universal Carbon Co.,Ltd in May of 2001.We timely filed an opposition against this questionable mark while it was published in 2002.For your information,we mainly argued that our client is a professional manufacturer in the field of manufacturing the products"carbon brushed;seal rings"in the world.Due to the favorable product quality and long time promotion,the brand name "SCHUNK logo"has acquiredcertain reputation in this field.Furthermore the opponent has already carried out its business activities in Chinese market since 1980s and the opponent established thesubsidiary company in 1996.Consuderubg the brand name "SCHUNK logo"has beenused almost one century by the opponent,it can referred that the opposed party,as an entity in the same trade,applied for the trademark "SCHUNK logo",merely in bad faith with an attempt of capitalizing on the good reputation on this brand name.
The opposed party filed a counterarguments within prescribed period arguing the opposed mark"SCHUNK logo"was original created on its own.The opponent's earlier unregistered mark is not a well known trademark so that can not deserve extensive protection against the opposed mark.
At the end of last month,we have received the subjiet Notification in which the Trademark Ofice made an unfavorable decision on the opposition.The office ascertai ed that:
1.The opponent have neer applied for any earlier trademark"SCHUNK logo"in class 9 in China
2.The registration of the opposed mark"SCHUNK logo"comp;oed with the "first-to-file"principle prescribed in Chinese trademark law so that can be approved.
3.The opponent said the opposed party pre-empted its earlier reputable mark"SCHUNK logo"and submitted many materials an circumstantial evidences.However,all these evidences were provided by the opponent and \or its subsidiary company and most of Englosh materials are copies and have not been fully translated.

请允许我介绍我们的企业是商标代办处在中国为Schunk Gumbh 。你知道, 客户的房子标记SHUNK 商标由南通普遍碳先占有了Co., 有限公司在5月2001.We 实时性归档了反对反对这个可疑的标记当它被出版了在2002.For 您的信息, 我们主要争辩说, 我们的客户是一位专业制造者在制造领域products"carbon brushed;seal rings"in world.Due 对有利产品质量和久时间促进, 名牌"SCHUNK logo"has acquiredcertain 名誉在对手已经执行它的经营活动在中国市场上从80 年代的这field.Furthermore 并且对手建立了thesubsidiary 公司在名牌"SCHUNK logo"has beenused 几乎一个世纪由对手的1996.Consuderubg, 它能提到贸易, 应用为商标"SCHUNK logo", 仅仅欺诈以利用好名誉企图在这个名牌。被反对的党归档了counterarguments 在被规定的期间内争论原物被创造在它的own.The 对手的更加早期的未登记的标记不是一个知名的商标的被反对的mark"SCHUNK logo"was 以便不能该当广泛的保护反对被反对的标记。在上个月的结尾, 我们接受了商标Ofice 做一个不赞同的决定在opposition.The 办公室ascertai 编辑那的subjiet 通知: 1.The 对手有neer 申请任一更加早期的trademark"SCHUNK logo"in 组9 在被反对的mark"SCHUNK 的中国2.The 注册logo"comp;oed 与"一对file"principle 规定在中国商标法律以便能是批准。3.The 对手认为被反对的党先占有了它更加早期的名声好的mark"SCHUNK logo"and 递交了许多材料间接evidences.However, 所有这些证据由对手提供了并且\or 它的分公司和大多Englosh 材料是拷贝和不充分地被翻译了。
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2006-09-05
请允许我介绍我们公司在中国的商标机构GumbhSchunk. 众所周知,用户家马克Shunk标识预设的南通世界碳有限公司可对2001.we及时提出了反对这一问题是虽然公布2002.for参考,主要说我们的客户是专业生产从事制造业的产品碳引用. 印章戒指"在world.due向有利产品质量和长的时间提升、品牌名称"Schunk标识已acquiredcertain声誉在这field.furthermore对手已经进行其商业活动于中国市场自1980和对手既定thesubsidiary公司在1996.consuderubg的品牌"Schunk标识已beenused几乎一个世纪由对手,它可以转介,反对党,作为一个整体在同一贸易、申请 商标"标志Schunk,只是恶意的企图利用这一品牌的声誉. 反对的一方提出counterarguments在规定的期限说是反对"Schunk标识是建立在原own.The对方以前是不是没有知名商标,不应该防止大量是反对. 上月底,我们接到通知,商标subjietofice了不利决定opposition.TheAscertai32处: 1.the对手此前已申请商标neer"Schunk标志"中国九级 2.the登记的是不是"Schunk标识comp. 办公室的"先申请原则中国商标法规定,可以通过. 3.the对手表示反对党派抢先以前是著名"Schunk标识,并提出许多物质的环境Evidences.however,这些证据提供了对手,下午或其附属公司的大部分Englosh资料册,还没有完全落实.
第2个回答  2006-09-19
严重鄙视用翻译软件作答的,你自己看看,说的是人话吗?
相似回答
大家正在搜