to every extent possible work performed must be on the basis of recognised employment relationship established through national law and practice.
Obligations to employees under labour or socal security laws and regulations arising from the regular employment relationship shall not be avoided through the used of labour-only contracting, sub-contracting, or homeworking arrangements, or through apprenticeship schemes where there is no real intent to impart skills or provide regular employment, nor shall any such obligations be avoided through the excessive use of fixed-term contracts of employment.
Physical abuse or discipline, the threat of physical abuse, sexual or other harassment and verbal abuse or other forms of intimidation shall be prohibited.
Only workers with a legal right to work shall be employed or used by the supplier.
All workers, including employment agency staff, must be validated by the supplier for their legal right to work by reviewing original documentation.
Employment agencies must only supply workers registered with them,
The supplier shall implement processes to enable adequate control over agencies with regards to the above points and related legislation.
Suppliers are expected to implement and maintain systems for delivering compliance to this Code.
Suppliers shall appoint a senior member of management who shall be responsible for compliance with the Code.
Suppliers are expected to communicate this Code to all employees and to their suppliers.
Suppliers should, where reasonably practicable, extend the principles of this ethical code through their supply chain.
There should be no sub-contracting unless previously agreed with the main client.
Suppliers shall seek to make continuous improvements in their environmental performance and, as a minimum, comply with the requirements of local and international laws and regulations.
The supplier shall be aware of and comply with their end clients' environmental requirements.
Based on site observation and document review, no chemicals were used in the factory, main waste in the factory was the living waste water. The factory had paid to local authority for disposing living waste water, it was acceptable. No negative evidence was identified during the audit.
Please list below any specific community benefits that the site management stated that they were involved in, for example: HIV programme, education, sports facilities.
Description of non-compliance
Local law or ETI requirement
Recommended corrective action
Objective evidence observed
Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA) Report (Version 2.3, April 2009)
不要在线翻译器翻译的哦。读不通。谢谢各位少侠!!~~