写作思路：根据题目要求，以“有关选文科还是理科的讨论”作为主题，可以写出这两方面的独自的特点，最后进行总结，只要自己选择的，那就是最好的，正文：
Some students are entangled in which future of arts and sciences is more prosperous; Some students are entangled in the choice between future and interest;
有的同学纠结的是，文理分科哪一个前程更加繁华似锦；有的同学纠结的是，在前程和兴趣之间，应该怎样的抉择；
If you choose science, you will choose a long sea of questions, such as Newton Kepler, Mendeleev Dalton, and the inevitable arrangement and combination. Of course, there will be more choices in the future, and the more majors you can study.
选择理科，就选择了漫漫的题海，什么牛顿开普勒，门捷列夫道尔顿，还有解不开的排列组合。当然，以后选择的空间更大，可以学习的专业越多。
If you choose liberal arts, you can have time to read more books, broaden your horizons, and broaden your thinking. Moreover, liberal arts are easier to get started than science.
选择文科，可以有时间多读书，开阔自己的视野，同时还可以拓宽自己思考问题的广度，而且，文科比理科相对容易入门。
In fact, as long as it is your choice, it is the best arrangement.
其实，只要是自己选择的就是最好的安排。
温馨提示：答案为网友推荐，仅供参考
第1个回答 2016-01-18
Liberal arts science of choice has always been a headache problem, many people in the wrong direction outset. When the thought of the liberal arts or science, a lot of students and parents, the first thought is "liberal arts science which future employment prospects better? More promising?" In fact, the question itself is wrong. Because no matter liberal arts science, corresponds to a lot of professional, we have a good professional, but also have relatively less Haozhaogongzuo professional, such as liberal arts in the history of philosophy, science of geology archeology, arts and science be compared directly without significance. And, no matter what profession, even relatively poor professional, if we can learn well, can still have a good future, even if is a good professional, if the school mess, nor Haozhaogongzuo.
Therefore, the key issue is not the liberal arts or science which is better, but I'm more suited to study liberal arts or science? On both subjects, which can play to my strengths, which I was able to learn better, which is what I really interested in? Only to find answers to these questions, we can make the right choice.
For themselves, can learn, are interested in the future will be able to get good grades in the entrance into a good school and a good professional, there will be more ambitious future. This is the crux of the problem, leave these things to talk about the merits of arts and sciences, is the paper.
I am in high school, when faced with the choice, liberal arts science scores actually very good. My homeroom teacher pulled me into the office gave me two hours of ideological work, strongly suggested that I read the science, because she thinks science is more promising, but the most important reason is that the choice of science to study the future of liberal arts transfer very easy. If you choose the arts, the future transfer of science is almost impossible. But I still resolutely chose the arts, because I believe that my expertise and interest in this, the last I to Jiangjin first liberal arts, she was admitted the Renmin University of China Law School. Now, my own choice was still satisfied.
Objectively speaking, the difference between arts and science teacher, I say most of them are true. My graduate school of economics, which is a traditional liberal arts majors, but the class has a lot of high school and undergraduate students are learning science, and some school mapping, prospecting and some to learn, even people learn aircraft manufacturing. But they still can learn good economics. And if I now want to study university physics chemistry and the like, it is almost impossible. In this sense, science is indeed wider than the choices liberal arts.
But no matter how wide of a person's choices, and finally he just like other people, can only choose one path to development. I love the arts, like economics, but also to learn them well, that's enough, why are we even have the ability to make their own learning university physics it? I am now engaged in writing, speaking, etc. activities, both of my high school, liberal arts university foundation inseparable, and this is exactly what I am most interested in, therefore I am very happy.
If I had chosen science, I believe the results will be good, but it is absolutely impossible to test the city's first. Because the arts are my most suitable and favorite subjects, but science is not.
Advantage is the choice of a wide range of science, but also to learn something more professional, more clearly when the direction of employment, competition is relatively small. If you study the bio-engineering, then on the job in this direction, such as economics or other professional bridge design, telecommunications aspect of students who simply can not compete with you. But if you learn is marketing, then the job recruitment marketing staff, in fact, almost all liberal arts school who have the potential to compete with you - though you'll comparative advantage, but this advantage is not bio-engineering for bridges designed so absolute.
But science problems will be here, will limit your professional direction you looking for a job, almost no competition in the engineering student was in addition to other aspects of biological relevance. Although you can go to choose marketing or business management class work, but this means that you are in high school and college years expertise in four years of study is almost entirely void, must re-start. And arts professionals, in this respect is much better to deal with, such as my undergraduate studies in law, economics graduate study, but the study of the process of the economy has a good knowledge of the law and legal logic is obviously also helpful, "The law of economy Analysis "is also serious when I was in undergraduate study before.
Science learning there is a very serious problem, that is, if you really learn well on a subject, then the subject is substantially even finished, it will pull down with the best students astonishing gap. I take the well-known mathematical terms, outstanding students more than 130 points in mathematics college entrance examination is normal, but if someone really learn bad math, then the 30 minutes and 40 minutes is normal. And in the language, such political subjects, there would be so amazing gap. College Entrance politics, history, languages are difficult test to 130 points or more, but it is not easy test to 80 points or less.
So, if you are good in science subjects, while no interest in political history, then obviously choose science. If the contrary is clearly choose liberal arts. If you have a door in Chemical Physics think there is no way, but also learn bad political history, then I think the best choice liberal arts, because a poor physical chemistry might be someone else pulled out or even several percentage , and political history as long as a lot of effort to learn, how the others will not be dragged into such a big gap.
As for mathematics, for a liberal arts students is concerned, if he has an advantage in that regard, then he studied liberal arts can protect themselves get a good result in the college entrance examination. If a student of mathematics feel totally powerless, then the best choice is still the liberal arts.
Really painful is that the average score, as if what subjects are not particularly outstanding, but what subjects are not particularly good student. This time the most important thing is to look at the individual interest. If you are determined to engage in legal profession, then you should choose the arts, although science students also read the law no problem, but when a good school for your future political history knowledge learning law is clearly a great benefit. If you're really on the political history of these things is not cold, and like some of the more objective and more simple things like calculate the figures, then do not choose the reluctance of the liberal arts. "Interest is the best teacher," the power of this sentence, the longer able to highlight its power. Contrary to their own inner preferences, because of some other reason, they did not choose the subject of interest, be able to learn even a little while, a long time, always tired, feel the pain, feeling wavering.
When you are not sure what they do best liberal arts or science or liberal arts or science prefer when there is a way to close your eyes, imagine yourself in the future most want to be what kind of person? A scientist, an economist, a politician, a building designer or whatever occupation. Then ask yourself, to become such a figure, most should have knowledge of what is a partial text or partial reason, this time, you will find the right answer.本回答被网友采纳
Therefore, the key issue is not the liberal arts or science which is better, but I'm more suited to study liberal arts or science? On both subjects, which can play to my strengths, which I was able to learn better, which is what I really interested in? Only to find answers to these questions, we can make the right choice.
For themselves, can learn, are interested in the future will be able to get good grades in the entrance into a good school and a good professional, there will be more ambitious future. This is the crux of the problem, leave these things to talk about the merits of arts and sciences, is the paper.
I am in high school, when faced with the choice, liberal arts science scores actually very good. My homeroom teacher pulled me into the office gave me two hours of ideological work, strongly suggested that I read the science, because she thinks science is more promising, but the most important reason is that the choice of science to study the future of liberal arts transfer very easy. If you choose the arts, the future transfer of science is almost impossible. But I still resolutely chose the arts, because I believe that my expertise and interest in this, the last I to Jiangjin first liberal arts, she was admitted the Renmin University of China Law School. Now, my own choice was still satisfied.
Objectively speaking, the difference between arts and science teacher, I say most of them are true. My graduate school of economics, which is a traditional liberal arts majors, but the class has a lot of high school and undergraduate students are learning science, and some school mapping, prospecting and some to learn, even people learn aircraft manufacturing. But they still can learn good economics. And if I now want to study university physics chemistry and the like, it is almost impossible. In this sense, science is indeed wider than the choices liberal arts.
But no matter how wide of a person's choices, and finally he just like other people, can only choose one path to development. I love the arts, like economics, but also to learn them well, that's enough, why are we even have the ability to make their own learning university physics it? I am now engaged in writing, speaking, etc. activities, both of my high school, liberal arts university foundation inseparable, and this is exactly what I am most interested in, therefore I am very happy.
If I had chosen science, I believe the results will be good, but it is absolutely impossible to test the city's first. Because the arts are my most suitable and favorite subjects, but science is not.
Advantage is the choice of a wide range of science, but also to learn something more professional, more clearly when the direction of employment, competition is relatively small. If you study the bio-engineering, then on the job in this direction, such as economics or other professional bridge design, telecommunications aspect of students who simply can not compete with you. But if you learn is marketing, then the job recruitment marketing staff, in fact, almost all liberal arts school who have the potential to compete with you - though you'll comparative advantage, but this advantage is not bio-engineering for bridges designed so absolute.
But science problems will be here, will limit your professional direction you looking for a job, almost no competition in the engineering student was in addition to other aspects of biological relevance. Although you can go to choose marketing or business management class work, but this means that you are in high school and college years expertise in four years of study is almost entirely void, must re-start. And arts professionals, in this respect is much better to deal with, such as my undergraduate studies in law, economics graduate study, but the study of the process of the economy has a good knowledge of the law and legal logic is obviously also helpful, "The law of economy Analysis "is also serious when I was in undergraduate study before.
Science learning there is a very serious problem, that is, if you really learn well on a subject, then the subject is substantially even finished, it will pull down with the best students astonishing gap. I take the well-known mathematical terms, outstanding students more than 130 points in mathematics college entrance examination is normal, but if someone really learn bad math, then the 30 minutes and 40 minutes is normal. And in the language, such political subjects, there would be so amazing gap. College Entrance politics, history, languages are difficult test to 130 points or more, but it is not easy test to 80 points or less.
So, if you are good in science subjects, while no interest in political history, then obviously choose science. If the contrary is clearly choose liberal arts. If you have a door in Chemical Physics think there is no way, but also learn bad political history, then I think the best choice liberal arts, because a poor physical chemistry might be someone else pulled out or even several percentage , and political history as long as a lot of effort to learn, how the others will not be dragged into such a big gap.
As for mathematics, for a liberal arts students is concerned, if he has an advantage in that regard, then he studied liberal arts can protect themselves get a good result in the college entrance examination. If a student of mathematics feel totally powerless, then the best choice is still the liberal arts.
Really painful is that the average score, as if what subjects are not particularly outstanding, but what subjects are not particularly good student. This time the most important thing is to look at the individual interest. If you are determined to engage in legal profession, then you should choose the arts, although science students also read the law no problem, but when a good school for your future political history knowledge learning law is clearly a great benefit. If you're really on the political history of these things is not cold, and like some of the more objective and more simple things like calculate the figures, then do not choose the reluctance of the liberal arts. "Interest is the best teacher," the power of this sentence, the longer able to highlight its power. Contrary to their own inner preferences, because of some other reason, they did not choose the subject of interest, be able to learn even a little while, a long time, always tired, feel the pain, feeling wavering.
When you are not sure what they do best liberal arts or science or liberal arts or science prefer when there is a way to close your eyes, imagine yourself in the future most want to be what kind of person? A scientist, an economist, a politician, a building designer or whatever occupation. Then ask yourself, to become such a figure, most should have knowledge of what is a partial text or partial reason, this time, you will find the right answer.本回答被网友采纳
相似回答