怎样把下面的话翻译成英语??

校服的质地不好,含棉量少,化纤成分多,颜色老气,样式陈旧,穿着起来显示不出美感,质地不好而且收费高,孩子正处于成长期,往往过了一段时间校服就不能再穿了,造成了一定的困难。
有校服一样避免不了学生的攀比行为,就用目前大热的一个话题——学生应否带手机进校园来说,这就是一种攀比,可以用来攀比的东西太多了,岂止是衣服!运动鞋、自行车、电子产品、家长的地位、金钱、汽车、洋房、别墅、甚至眼镜、书包、各种文具都可以互相攀比,穿一样的衣服就能解决攀比的问题吗?
扼杀了学生的个性,学生的审美观
挑选衣服,也是一种能力的培养,不是说审美观很重要吗?不是懂得艺术欣赏才叫审美的,衣着搭配是一种眼光,一种从生活中得来审美意识。
穿校服弊病太多了:一是剥夺了学生对美的追求,严重阻碍了他们审美能力的培养;二是校服的统一,抑制他们个性的发展,这个问题,对于我们整个民族来说,损失是巨大的;三是培养了学生的服从意识,但抹杀了学生们的反叛精神、创新意识。

The school uniform quality of material is not good, are few including the cotton and kapok quantity, the chemical fiber ingredient are many, the color is old mannish, the style is obsolete, puts on the demonstration not to leave the esthetic sense, the quality of material not not well moreover collects fees high, the child is being in the growth period, often crossed a period of time school uniform not to be able again to put on, has caused certain difficulty.
There are uniforms like the students can not avoid comparisons, on the current use of a large hot topic - students should not carry mobile phones into the campus, this is a kind of compete with each other, things can be used to compete with each other too much, more than the clothes! Sports shoes, bicycles, electronic products, the status of the parents, money, cars, houses, villas, and even glasses, bags, all kinds of stationery can be mutually comparisons, wearing the same clothes comparisons will be able to solve the problem?
Stifled students personality, the aesthetics students
The selection of clothes, and is also a training capacity, said aesthetics is not very important? Not know how to art appreciation才叫aesthetic, clothing with a vision and a life was built from the aesthetic consciousness.
Too many in school uniforms ills: First, the United States deprived the students of the pursuit, which is seriously hampering the ability of their aesthetic culture; Second, the unified school uniform, inhibit the development of their personality, this issue, for our entire nation, the loss is enormous; Third, cultivate awareness of the students obedience, but the students denied the rebel spirit, sense of innovation.
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2007-11-04
The school uniform texture well, containing less cotton, synthetic ingredients, colors old mannish, pattern old, showed up wearing no aesthetics, high charges and poor texture, the child is in a stage of growth, often after some time will not be able to再穿the school uniform, causing certain difficulties.
There are uniforms like the students can not avoid comparisons, on the current use of a large hot topic - students should not carry mobile phones into the campus, this is a kind of compete with each other, things can be used to compete with each other too much, more than the clothes! Sports shoes, bicycles, electronic products, the status of the parents, money, cars, houses, villas, and even glasses, bags, all kinds of stationery can be mutually comparisons, wearing the same clothes comparisons will be able to solve the problem?
Stifled students personality, the aesthetics students
The selection of clothes, and is also a training capacity, said aesthetics is not very important? Not know how to art appreciation才叫aesthetic, clothing with a vision and a life was built from the aesthetic consciousness.
Too many in school uniforms ills: First, the United States deprived the students of the pursuit, which is seriously hampering the ability of their aesthetic culture; Second, the unified school uniform, inhibit the development of their personality, this issue, for our entire nation, the loss is enormous; Third, cultivate awareness of the students obedience, but the students denied the rebel spirit, sense of innovation.
第2个回答  2007-11-04
The school uniform quality of material is not good, contains thecotton and kapok quantity few, chemical fiber ingredient many, colorold mannish, style obsolete, puts on the demonstration not to leavethe esthetic sense, the quality of material is not good moreovercollects fees high, the child is being in long-term, often crossedperiod of time school uniforms not to be able again to put on, hascaused the certain difficulty.
Had the school uniform equally not to be able to avoid the studentcompeting the behavior, uses a present greatly hot topic - student toshould 带手 machine to enter the campus to say, this was one kindcompetes, was allowed to use for the thing which competed too to bemany, not only was clothes! The athletic shoes, the bicycle, theelectronic products, guardian's status, the money, the automobile, theforeign-style house, the villa, even the eyeglasses, the book bag,each kind of stationery all may mutually compete, puts on the questionwhich the same clothes can solve competes?
Has strangled student's individuality, student's aesthetic standard
Chooses clothes, also is one kind of ability raise, is not saidthe aesthetic standard is very important? Is not understood theartistic appreciation only then calls esthetically, the attire matchesis one kind of judgement, one kind comes from the life esthetically torealize.
Put on the school uniform disease too to be many: One, has deprivedthe student to the beautiful pursue, seriously has hindered theiresthetic ability raise; Two is the school uniform unification,suppresses their individuality development, this question, saidregarding our entire nationality, the loss is huge; Three, trained thestudent to obey consciousness, but has written off the studentsrebelled against the spirit, the innovative ideology.
相似回答