请各位大侠帮忙翻译下这篇文章,然后给出正确答案,万分感谢,会追加高分的............

Regular child care provided outside the home or by someone other than the mother does not in itself undermine healthy emotional connections between mothers and their 15-month-old infants, according to a long-term national study. The finding holds even if care begins during the first 3 months after birth and runs for 30 hours or more per week.
Among infants who receive unkind and unresponsive care from their mothers, however, the mother-child relationship may be damaged. "This research helps us put apart complexities regarding child care that have not previously been studied in detail," contends Jay Belsky, a psychologist.
The investigation consists of 1,153 children and their families living in or near Boston. The youngsters, no more than 1 month old when they entered the study in 1991, will be tracked until the age of 7. Experimenters administered questionnaires to mothers in their homes and videotaped baby caretakers interacting with the kids at ages 1, 6, and 15 months. Independent observers rated the quality of each child care efforts and noted infant nervousness. Unlike most previous studies, this one allows researchers to observe each caretaker's personality at child nursing, and kids' emotional reaction by the equipment.

1). From the first paragraph we know that______.
A. connections between mothers and infants are damaged by outside care
B. mother care is the best according to a national study
C. child care outside home is the best in accordance with the study
D. regular child care outside home may play a role as a mother
2). According to the passage, unresponsive care from a mother may______.
A. ruin a kid's growth
B. injure a baby's emotional reaction
C. harm the mother-child tie
D. spoil a child's personality
3). Jay Belsky implies that the study of child care______.
A. was not much done in detail in the past
B. was never carried out in the past
C. was greatly ignored by psychologists and researchers
D. was interesting, but very difficult to make discovery
4). The main difference between the investigation and the previous ones is that______.
A. the observers could rate the quality of child care efforts and analyzed them soon
B. video equipment enabled researchers to observe what was happening directly
C. the researchers were able to give the questionnaires to mothers in their homes
D. the researchers started with only one month old infants
5). Which of the following is not TRUE of the investigation?
A. It will last at least 7 years.
B. Cooperation from the mothers is also necessary.
C. Some independent observers play a part.
D. Researchers paid site visits to see a caretaker's personality and kids' emotional reaction.

自己翻译的~你看了译文之后再试试能不能做,不能做你再问我。其实翻译很简单,你把定语从句和状语从句先分开,看句子主干部分,然后分开翻,了解其意思,还有,不用所有的词句都翻出来,影响阅读速度。要特别注意有人说的说话的部分,如"This research helps us put apart complexities regarding child care that have not previously been studied in detail," 这些很有可能会是后面题目的答案。这些都是经验总结,望采纳!

根据一项长期的国民研究,由家庭之外或母亲以外的人提供定期的儿童照料就其本身而言,并不会破坏母亲和15个月大的孩子之间的健康的情感关系。这项发现即使(这种照料)发生在孩子出生后的前三个月并且照料时间为30小时或者更多每周依然成立。
但是,母婴关系在婴儿受到母亲的不友善和不反应的时候将会受到破坏。心理学家Jay Belsky说:“这项调查在过去不曾详细研究过的婴儿照料方面帮助我们减少其复杂性。”这项调查包含了住在波士顿或其附近的1153个孩子及其家庭。最小的,仅仅是1个月大当他们1991年进入到这项研究中,将会被追踪知道他们7岁。实验者在她们的家里把问卷给妈妈们并且录下婴儿照看者与1岁,6岁和15个月大的孩子之间的互动。独立的旁观者估计每个儿童照料的质量并且记下儿童的精神状况。与之前的大多数的研究不同,这项研究允许调查者去观察在儿童看护所里每个照看者的品格和由设备测出的孩子的情绪反映。
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2011-08-25
定期以外的家庭或其他人比母亲提供幼儿本身并不损害健康的母亲和她们的15个月大的婴儿之间的情感联系,根据一项长期的全国性研究。这一发现持有照顾,即使在出生后前3个月期间开始,运行30小时或更长时间,每周。
然而,在收到从他们的母亲于心不忍,反应迟钝护理的婴儿中,母亲与子女的关系可能会损坏。周杰伦Belsky,心理学家,争辩道:“:”这项研究帮助我们把除了复杂,以前没有详细研究的幼儿。
调查由1153的儿童和他们的家庭生活或在波士顿附近的。年轻一辈,不超过1个月岁的时候,他们于1991年的研究,将跟踪直到7岁。实验者管理问卷在他们的家园和录像与孩子们互动,年龄1,6,和15个月的婴儿照料母亲。独立观察员额定每个儿童的保健工作的质量,并指出婴儿紧张。大多数以前的研究不同,这使研究人员能够观察每个看守的个性在儿童护理,和孩子们的情绪反应设备

我英语不怎么好,你还是看看 别人的意见吧本回答被网友采纳
第2个回答  2011-08-26
1.D 第一段的主要意思是外界的照顾或妈妈以外的照顾不会破坏母亲与婴儿的关系。
2.C 母亲的不负责任的看护会破坏亲子关系。
3. A
4. B文章最后一句说的很明确。
5. D没提到。
第3个回答  2011-08-25
D.C.A.B.D
相似回答